Close Menu
    Trending
    Sunday, October 5
    World

    Liberia: The Press Union of Liberia’s $100,000 Question – Why Silence Cannot Be Liberia’s Strategy

    OneAfricaYTBy No Comments3 Mins Read
    Nigeria: When Lifelines Are Taxed - Remittance Clampdowns Could Threaten Health Access in Nigeria

    The Press Union of Liberia (PUL) stands at a crossroads, facing a question that demands an answer: What happened to the $100,000 donated in 2008 for its headquarters? Silence is no longer an option. For the PUL to protect truth and uphold its moral authority, it must confront this long-standing controversy openly and transparently.

    This issue is far from new. Former PUL leaders recently called on the current administration to account for the missing funds, highlighting the absence of a complete and clear explanation. Their call echoes concerns raised as far back as 2014 and persists through multiple leadership changes. When an ethical question lingers unresolved for so long, it signals that a deeper truth has yet to be told. Why does this matter to Liberia’s democracy?

    The PUL holds a unique role in defending transparency and accountability in government and society. To demand these values from others, the Union must first demonstrate them decisively within its own ranks. Upholding high standards internally strengthens credibility and trust. Conversely, silence and unresolved doubts foster suspicion and undermine confidence in the media. Accountability requires more than words; it demands action.


    Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines

    The PUL should immediately commission an independent forensic audit by a respected outsider, release all relevant financial and administrative documents, and publish full findings without filters. If mistakes or misconduct are uncovered, they must be acknowledged with clear explanations, consequences, and repayment plans where appropriate. Institutional reforms are essential, including conflict-of-interest rules, transparent donor policies, and oversight committees with external members.

    Finally, engaging the public through open forums will demonstrate the Union’s commitment to honesty and reform. Delay in resolving this issue weakens the PUL’s voice precisely when it is most needed. Harassed and threatened journalists rely on the Union’s defense, but unanswered questions about its own integrity invite critics to dismiss its advocacy. This risks not only the Union’s reputation but the strength of Liberia’s emerging democracy.

    There is cause for optimism. New contributions to the headquarters project show ongoing support. But future donors and partners will want assurance that the past is settled fairly and openly. By confronting its history, the PUL can transform a lingering shadow into a powerful example of integrity. This is a moment to say clearly: We are clean, so we can speak.